Litigation finance is an arrangement in terms of which a third-party makes a cash advance to cover the legal expenses of a claimant or plaintiff. Funds are normally provided on a ‘no win, no-pay’ basis, i.e. the third-party only receives a portion of the settlement if the case is successful.
The introduction of legal financing provides suitable plaintiffs with a means of paying the cost of litigation without having to resort to traditional borrowing.
The costs of legal representation (and associated expenses) can often be substantial and even a claimant with a strong case may not have access to sufficient available financial resources to pay for successful litigation. Litigation funding allows claimants or plaintiffs to pursue legal action without needing to finance the full cost of litigation. It “levels the playing field” and enables even small businesses and individuals with limited resources to access the legal remedies that would otherwise only be available to substantial or well-funded organisations.
Litigation funding, also known as “ Legal Financing” or “Litigation Finance”, is a method of financing the expenses of litigation by which a third-party makes an advance to a claimant or plaintiff in exchange for an agreed return if the relevant case is successful. The finance is provided in the form of a non-recourse loan which is not repaid if the case is unsuccessful (“no win, no pay”).
If the case is successful, the funder receives a share of the proceeds or an agreed percentage of the initial investment; the parties enter into standard agreements that comply with industry standards, such as those set by the Association of Litigation Funders (ALF) or European Litigation Funders Association (ELFA).
The significant benefits of litigation finance mean it is increasingly used as a funding mechanism. Even substantial, well financed companies use litigation funding to optimise their financial resources, improve cash flow and/or remove legal costs from their balance sheets.
Litigation funding has been permitted in England and Wales since 1967 (and in insolvency matters since the late nineteenth century). Recent years, however, have seen its growing acceptance as part of the litigation landscape and its usage has increased substantially.
It is also considered legal and is used in most English language jurisdictions including the US, Australia, Singapore, Hong Kong, South Africa and India, as well as many other countries.
A key benefit of working with a litigation funder is that a business can remove the cost of litigation from its balance sheet and thus incur no financial risk in undertaking litigation, no matter how complex or lengthy the case might become.
Litigation can be capital-intensive; working with a third-party funder means a business can avoid financial uncertainty and associated costs. As a result, corporations can retain core working capital within their businesses and invest funds directly into activities related to business development and value creation. By removing financial constraints, companies can allocate capital to core revenue generating activities that deliver a return on investment rather than expensive legal costs.
Not all companies have the financial resources to pursue litigation, even if they have a strong claim or case. Litigation finance helps to solve this problem by providing the required financial resources. In doing so, companies that may have been unwilling to file a legal claim due to financial or business constraints are able to pursue or defend a claim.
Litigation financing can be a valuable resource for claimants who may not have the funds to pursue a case, or who may want to avoid tying up their funds. It may be used for many purposes, such as